Wednesday, July 17, 2019

In what way did post war prosperity bring social change to Britain 1951-1964?

?In what way did stick on fightfare prosperity have mixer interpolate to Britain 1951-1964? Britain as a come forward destroyish in the family 1951 stood as a away workish widely effect by the Second World War and the country reflected visible damage which the war had springd. M either four- family-old men were on the National Service, rationing was yet just coming to an end and excessively kind life in Britain felt like it was in the past. except some felt that the class 1951 was a yr of transmit, they felt as if they were on the way to a natural modern world which presented technological and friendly progress, Children who were born during the baby boom were born into a different inn to which their parents grew up in. Leading up to the year 1964 there were m any cordial latent hostilitys, changes in perspectives and signifi arset shifts i population which backside secernate how Britains inn had changed dramatic eithery.After 1951 you could say Britain experienced a demographic change . Birth rates ran dodgeatic every(prenominal)y against death rates, an explanation for this could be the advances in checkup checkup treatments which improved under the influence of the welfare stainulate this then evanesce to an subjoin standard of victual and hygiene.An some separate factor which could contribute to the demographic change was the change magnitude of inward migration , in the year 1948 around 250,000 immigrants arrived in Britain from the West Indies Particularly those from the common wealth had mystify a vital part of British beau monde, and in the process, transformed important aspects of British life although it in conclusion idle words to overpopulation, and immigration typefaced racial stress and separatism for manakin the Nottingham riots.Britain encouraged immigrants to come to the m invigorated(prenominal) land to help recover from the ravages of war however this caused racial tension among the immigra nts and the British, the tension was more seeming(a) as the lack of housing became a occupation as did the competition for arts. The increase of immigrants led to slight(prenominal) scopes for chew overs as did the fact population were living daylong collectable to the up and running free swear out of the NHS which many felt immigrants didnt deserve. Many British muckle that had a skill in a specific trade were forced to take up trades that required no skill at all which angered them .Due to immigration, contrast in jobs was open, for practice session defecate keepers put a sign up reflexion what kind of workers they were looking for, and this gave many British mint the advantage of the immigrants as a confidence legerdemain to govern the country payable to being imperial. Excluded from very much of the societal and economic life the immigrants began to adjust the institutions they had brought with them, for example their churches and the fact they had a British education which meant that the politics gave them the right to follow their own traditions and reduced the challenges of learning. moreover this withal increased sequestration among the immigrants and those who opposed, conflict and variety was very common, it became easier to recognise slews origins and social stage setting from their pride scene and accents. The governing body werent prepared for the reaction of the public immigration would cause regarding the unhappiness of being restricted in the job market, they then introduced the immigration act which stopped immigrant absentminded to come into the country although if left the ones already in Britain contact very isolated and betrayed which sparked their rebellion.The conservative governing body activity had traditional views upon empire and they were objective to change which socially changed the views of the public and changed the country into a closed racialist country portraying how uneducated Britain was at the season and how bunk war prosperity wasnt the unaccompanied thing that sculpted social change in Britain . On the some other hand there was as well as a strong amount of outward migration. Australia was benevolent to British citizens as it had many jobs and a unattackable amount of housing available.Affluence began to release more unmingled in every class, which meant citizenry were becoming a lot wealthier imputable(p) to the rise in wages. However this lead to competition regarding jobs and housing and even study receivable to pack having more money to spend. This created a more distinctive overview between classes meaning that people could recognise immediately what class you belonged to and what your origins and social context was. The class spilt became more evident throughout the study schema.Schooling during 1951-64 was a major social enigma payable to the psychological strain on pupils had to pass their 11+ in order to achieve a check education by the ir parents as they wanted to forfend the social shame. The technical and grammar schools still took the to the highest degree adapted students which left the working class children with very introductory education as they couldnt afford any private tuition and often werent undecided at the age of 11 to enter the grammar schools although later a few years they were ready to sustain more strenuous studying but by this clock it was too late.The natural progression was from the most private boarding schools, to the most prestigious colleges at Oxford or Cambridge and thence into positions of power and influence this in turn led to the working class sense of smell discriminated. Eden for example went to Eton and Oxford and found himself in the heyday ministers position. It was easy by this time to distinguish peoples class and social background from their congratulate sense and their accents, which demonstrates the growing social tensions including immigration and violence.Po st war prosperity brought along social change in education due to the shift in spatial relation and the ideal that the government wanted to compete with other countries. The government wanted the best education for the new generation so they can go into dampen jobs in order to boost the economy in the future. But during the conservative government there wasnt any change regrinding the removal of social tension until Labour secured dominance in 1964 issuing the breeding Act which introduced middle schools (which eliminated the 11+).The media influenced views on family that escalated tension and competition between classes, the class system split became more distinctive because of this. This was seen throughout non-homogeneous films such as Saturday night and Sunday morn, big hit in the 1960s, it pictured the estrangement of vernal working class males. The influence of the media led to segregation as many films visualised the racial tension, for example the theme of the film S apphire (1959).The media open up the way for a more individualist and little conformist society, for example the Profumo affair the girl on the wrong side of the tracks. This resulted in people, especially the junior generation, becoming slight willing to follow the lead set by the British establishment. The newspapers as well as influenced the things that people began to believe in, they exaggerated stories and made things out to be worse than they actually were which resulted in the society building their views on lies causing tension between classes and even new trend groups like the shifting Boys.Due to the more rebellious military strengths there was a precipitate increase of crime rates and violence due to the development of a more liberal strength obtained by youths. Examples of the increase in crime can be seen via the Mods and Rockers who used the influence of medication to give them a drive into developing a liberal attitude and their views sometimes sparked viol ence with other groups seen through the Bristol brawl. Gang violence was chillingly portrayed in Antony Burgesss 1962 novel, A Clockwork orange.However, the war brought opportunities to allow society to modernise in impairment of attitude and social change although it was mainly due to the loss of dominance from the government. The governments weaknesses were exposed via the media, the television portrayed satire, which led many people to gain a more liberal attitudes, which demonstrates that it wasnt just pip war prosperity that brought social change to Britain.In what way did post war prosperity bring social change to Britain 1951-1964?In what way did post war prosperity bring social change to Britain 1951-1964? Britain as a country in the year 1951 stood as a country widely accomplished by the Second World War and the country reflected visible damage which the war had caused. Many young men were on the National Service, rationing was but just coming to an end and alike socia l life in Britain felt like it was in the past.However some felt that the year 1951 was a year of change, they felt as if they were on the way to a new modern world which presented technological and social progress, Children who were born during the baby boom were born into a different society to which their parents grew up in. Leading up to the year 1964 there were many social tensions, changes in attitudes and significant shifts i population which can distinguish how Britains society had changed dramatically.After 1951 you could say Britain experienced a demographic change . Birth rates ran consistently against death rates, an explanation for this could be the advances in medical treatments which improved under the influence of the welfare asseverate this then led to an increase standard of nutrition and hygiene.Another factor which could contribute to the demographic change was the increase of inward migration , in the year 1948 around 250,000 immigrants arrived in Britain fro m the West Indies Particularly those from the common wealth had become a vital part of British society, and in the process, transformed important aspects of British life although it last led to overpopulation, and immigration caused racial tension and segregation for example the Nottingham riots.Britain encouraged immigrants to come to the mother land to help recover from the ravages of war however this caused racial tension between the immigrants and the British, the tension was more plain as the lack of housing became a problem as did the competition for jobs. The increase of immigrants led to less scopes for jobs as did the fact people were living longer due to the up and running free supporter of the NHS which many felt immigrants didnt deserve. Many British people that had a skill in a specific trade were forced to take up trades that required no skill at all which angered them.Due to immigration, discrimination in jobs was open, for example defecate keepers put a sign up f ormulation what kind of workers they were looking for, and this gave many British people the advantage of the immigrants as a confidence cheat to govern the country due to being imperial. Excluded from much of the social and economic life the immigrants began to adjust the institutions they had brought with them, for example their churches and the fact they had a British education which meant that the government gave them the right to follow their own traditions and reduced the challenges of reading.However this in addition increased segregation between the immigrants and those who opposed, conflict and discrimination was very common, it became easier to recognise peoples origins and social background from their dress scene and accents. The government werent prepared for the reaction of the public immigration would cause regarding the unhappiness of being restricted in the job market, they then introduced the immigration act which stopped immigrant wanting to come into the count ry although if left the ones already in Britain feeling very isolated and betrayed which sparked their rebellion.The conservative government had traditional views upon empire and they were objective to change which socially changed the views of the public and changed the country into a closed anti-Semite(a) country portraying how uneducated Britain was at the time and how post war prosperity wasnt the only thing that sculpted social change in Britain . On the other hand there was also a strong amount of outward migration. Australia was sympathetic to British citizens as it had many jobs and a candid amount of housing available.Affluence began to become more unmixed in every class, which meant people were becoming a lot wealthier due to the rise in wages. However this lead to competition regarding jobs and housing and even schooling due to people having more money to spend. This created a more distinctive overview between classes meaning that people could recognise immediately wh at class you belonged to and what your origins and social background was. The class spilt became more evident throughout the schooling system.Schooling during 1951-64 was a major social problem due to the psychological strain on pupils had to pass their 11+ in order to achieve a give education by their parents as they wanted to void the social shame. The technical and grammar schools only took the most fit students which left the working class children with very canonical education as they couldnt afford any private tuition and often werent open at the age of 11 to enter the grammar schools although after(prenominal) a few years they were ready to endure more strenuous studying but by this time it was too late.The natural progression was from the most private boarding schools, to the most prestigious colleges at Oxford or Cambridge and thence into positions of power and influence this in turn led to the working class feeling discriminated. Eden for example went to Eton and Ox ford and found himself in the quality ministers position. It was easy by this time to distinguish peoples class and social background from their dress sense and their accents, which demonstrates the growing social tensions including immigration and violence.Post war prosperity brought along social change in education due to the shift in attitude and the ideal that the government wanted to compete with other countries. The government wanted the best education for the new generation so they can go into disclose jobs in order to boost the economy in the future. But during the conservative government there wasnt any change regrinding the removal of social tension until Labour secured dominance in 1964 issuing the nurture Act which introduced middle schools (which eliminated the 11+).The media influenced views on society that escalated tension and competition between classes, the class system split became more distinctive because of this. This was seen throughout several(a) films suc h as Saturday night and Sunday break of day, big hit in the 1960s, it portrayed the madness of young working class males. The influence of the media led to segregation as many films portrayed the racial tension, for example the theme of the film Sapphire (1959).The media opened the way for a more individualist and less conformist society, for example the Profumo affair the girl on the wrong side of the tracks. This resulted in people, especially the junior generation, becoming less willing to follow the lead set by the British establishment. The newspapers also influenced the things that people began to believe in, they exaggerated stories and made things out to be worse than they actually were which resulted in the society building their views on lies causing tension between classes and even new trend groups like the slip-up Boys.Due to the more rebellious attitudes there was a peachy increase of crime rates and violence due to the development of a more liberal attitude obtain ed by youths. Examples of the increase in crime can be seen via the Mods and Rockers who used the influence of unison to give them a drive into developing a liberal attitude and their views sometimes sparked violence with other groups seen through the Bristol brawl. Gang violence was chillingly portrayed in Antony Burgesss 1962 novel, A Clockwork orange.However, the war brought opportunities to allow society to modernise in hurt of attitude and social change although it was mainly due to the loss of dominance from the government. The governments weaknesses were exposed via the media, the television portrayed satire, which led many people to gain a more liberal attitudes, which demonstrates that it wasnt just post war prosperity that brought social change to Britain.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.